GSSA: Gaussian Surfels with Spatial Awareness for Surface Reconstruction

Haojun Tang1, Siyuan Zou1,2, Hongbo Pan1, Yixin Lu3, Shun Zhou1
1School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University   2Key Laboratory of China-ASEAN Satellite Remote Sensing Applications, Ministry of Natural Resources   3Guangxi Beibu Gulf Investment Group Co., Ltd.

Journal Core Engine Stars Forks Last Commit License

TSDF   VS   Ours

Ours
Ours
TSDF
TSDF
GSSA Pipeline

Abstract

3D Gaussian Splatting is effective in multi-view surface reconstruction tasks, fundamental to photogrammetry applications. Mainstream pipelines focus on optimizing for explicit Gaussians to enhance volumetric rendering quality, typically relying on rendering-based Truncated Signed Distance Function (TSDF) methods for reconstruction, while the training and meshing often suffer from missing details and geometric distortions under occlusions or restricted viewpoints. In this paper, we focus on a new problem definition: directly formulating implicit surface representation exploiting geometric features of trained Gaussian Surfels. For this problem, we introduce Gaussian Surfels with Spatial Awareness (GSSA) for reconstruction, a spatially aware reconstruction framework that optimizes for Surfel distributions from geometric primitives via a 3D refiner, and constructs SDF by integrating signed distances from voxel vertices to nearby Surfels. Compared with state-of-the-art GS-based, especially Surfel-based, reconstruction methods, GSSA achieves both competitive geometric accuracy and efficiency. On terrestrial (indoor object) and airborne (photogrammetry) reconstruction benchmarks, GSSA maintains a competitive balance between reconstruction time and accuracy. Further migration experiments demonstrate that GSSA can also be integrated as a plug-and-play module into general Surfel-based pipelines.

Method

Overview
Overview of GSSA.

Results

Qualitative Comparison

(a) Image Regions
(b) TSDF
(c) Poisson
(d) α-Shape
(e) GOF
(g) NeuS
(h) Ours
(i) Ours (color)
(j) Ground Truth
Qualitative comparison between GSSA and baselines on UAV and BlendedMVS datasets. Yellow boxes highlight detail regions.

Quantitative Comparison

Quantitative accuracy evaluation on UAV dataset.
Method Precision (%) ↑ Recall (%) ↑ F1 Score (%) ↑ Chamfer ↓ Mean Normal (°) ↓ Hausdorff ↓
TSDF91.692.892.20.018948.10.3274
Poisson80.491.885.70.019839.60.3269
α-Shape87.183.985.50.018048.50.3251
GOF81.089.885.10.019948.80.3272
NeuS81.777.679.60.020243.00.3149
Ours93.492.893.10.017934.80.3105
Quantitative accuracy evaluation on BlendedMVS dataset.
Method Precision (%) ↑ Recall (%) ↑ F1 Score (%) ↑ Chamfer ↓ Mean Normal (°) ↓ Hausdorff ↓
TSDF34.475.647.30.005753.40.4983
Poisson49.982.462.20.005149.40.7649
α-Shape93.668.178.80.001150.80.2435
GOF95.168.679.70.000843.20.1694
NeuS71.970.171.00.001846.00.2104
Ours88.677.282.50.001047.30.1683

Acknowledgements

This project benefits from 2DGS, CityGaussianV2. Thanks for their great work!

License

This project is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Commercial use requires prior consent. See LICENSE details.

BibTeX

If you find our work helpful, please cite:
@article{tang2026gssa,
    title = {GSSA: Gaussian Surfels with Spatial Awareness for Surface Reconstruction},
    author = {Tang, Haojun and Zou, Siyuan and Pan, Hongbo and Lu, Yixin and Zhou, Shun},
    journal = {Remote Sensing},
    year = {2026}
}